Manual Evidence Review
Manual Evidence Review
A public-safe concept page explaining blank reviewer evidence fields, pass/caution/no-op/human-review decisions, and manual notes.
Public glossary concept
Manual Evidence Review
Plain-language definition: A human reviewer records what they saw and how they judged a quote or route.
Technical definition: A blank-by-default reviewer workflow with fields for excerpts, UTC observation time, pass/caution/no-op/human-review decisions, notes, and follow-up action.
Why it matters: It keeps review evidence explicit without claiming a static site performed live checks.
Hard-boundary note: No runtime AI behavior, no runtime search service, no model training, no live crawling, no telemetry loops, no agent execution, no endpoint execution, no credential validation, no private-network probing, no remote-site writes, no webhooks, no tunnel opening, no screenshot automation, no rollback automation, no correction automation, no safety certification, no consciousness claim, no biological-equivalence claim, no medical/therapy claim, and no command-and-control claim over other domains.
Quote examples
Safe quote example: Manual evidence review records reviewer observations and decision fields for later human evaluation.
Unsafe expansion example: Manual evidence review certifies that external endpoints are safe and current.
Corrected replacement wording: Manual evidence review provides blank fields for humans to fill; it does not certify external systems.